Nicky Tesla
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2008
- Messages
- 1,652
- Reaction score
- 12
equi-bond? Andy?
100%"n that case I can not see how the internal metal water or gas pipes can not be seen as extraneous-conductive-parts. They have the ability to introduce apotential."The above posts are refering to Ians last post quoted above
I feel that the wording is clear and that if you do not bond it and someone is injured/killed you will be facing criminal charges.They all have the ability, so lets all bond them from now on
Agree entirely. And the quote from 411.3.1.2 in the current edition reads quite clearly that they are regarded as extraneous conductive parts and must therefore be bonded, just as was the case back in the 14th edition rule that I posted some time ago.In that case I can not see how the internal metal water or gas pipes can not be seen as extraneous-conductive-parts. They have the ability to introduce a potential.
By all means test to see if extraneous but lets not confuse matters, muddying the water, worrying about internal faults.The ERA tests confirm that tap water in a plastic pipe is a poor conductor ofelectricity. One metre of 15mm diameter of plastic pipe filled with tap water from
Leatherhead where the ERA are based, has resistance of 100,000 ohms. This one
metre of 15mm pipe will restrict currents to less than fatal values and of course in
practice, there would be many metres of pipe between metal items of plumbing
equipment and earth.
Check out my post at #96.Reading this thread does make my head hurt, but I point I've not noticed (or skim read past) is what we mean when we say "extraneous conductive parts".
Thats the popular misconception as in this case extraneous meens external to the electrical system NOT to the property.Some electrical fault that occurred inside the house causing some metalwork to become live is NOT extraneous, it's just plane old LIVE from a fault.
My bad!Check out my post at #96.
See my post at #109. We are referring to metal pipes inside a property supplied form a plastic incomer.My bad!I see your post but unsure how you can come to the conclusion that plastic pipe needs bonding. Water is a poor conductor of electricity. Plastic is a known insulator.
We're back to bonding the door handles and window frames in that context.Thats the popular misconception as in this case extraneous meens external to the electrical system NOT to the property.
How can the central heating pipes induce earth potential by being in the same equipotential zone?Extraneous-conductive-part. A conductive part liable to introduce a potential, generally Earth potential, and not forming part of the electrical installation.
How about because the plumber decided to use your wires as support for his heating pipes and it mented all the insulation off and now line is connected to the pipes?How can the central heating pipes induce earth potential by being in the same equipotential zone?
and the same can apply if you unnecessarily bond something and introduce a fatal voltage that would never have existedI feel that the wording is clear and that if you do not bond it and someone is injured/killed you will be facing criminal charges.
The definition does not say that the potential introduced MUST be Earth to be classed as an E-C-P; it states that it would generally be so. I must agree with Ian & PBC here; irrespective of the material the incomer is constructed of, unless the whole installation is polybutyl PBX, I`d be expecting to bond it, in some way, shape or form.BRB Part 2 page 24]Extraneous-conductive-part: A conductive part liable to introduce a potential, generally Earth potential, and not forming part of the electrical installation.
i would expect the answer to be yes. but i dont remember any news stories of anyone being killed because of itHas ANYONE ever been hurt, injured or killed as a result of (technically) non-essential bonding?
I wouldn`t expect so..........
KME
Enter your email address to join: