I don't think they thought of that Binky , too busy conjouring up more stuff to justify another edition of the regs .so where do we stand on IP rated CUs? I'm thinking garage units in damp places, can't imagine a metal CU lasting for years or being easy to seal.
Although the metal box would most likely be IP65 or better so the CU won't need to be anything more than a standard insulated unit, at which point I would say you might as well just stick a piece of DIN rail on the backplate of the box.Keep up Binks.
You asked for a solution for an IP rated DB. Put that IP rated DB in a metal box.
I assumed by IP rated you meant GRP.
MCBs mounted on a din rail?.??? Please.No, but they serve no purpose and are pointless. Feel free to downvote every post I make if it gets you off. I don't see why you not being able to understand a post makes it need downvoting.
what do you do with yours?MCBs mounted on a din rail?.??? Please.
you didn't say that did you Ernie and who can keep up with the fastest milkman in the west. :^OKeep up Binks.
You asked for a solution for an IP rated DB. Put that IP rated DB in a metal box.
I assumed by IP rated you meant GRP.
Yes, sort of.Is a garage unit considered domestic when the garage is remote to the house?
Source: http://electrical.theiet.org/wiring-matters/55/consumer-units/index.cfmConsumer units in outbuildings or on the outside of a building
Regulation 421.1.201 uses the term ‘premises’. The question could therefore arise: do the requirements of the regulation apply to a consumer unit or similar switchgear assembly within an outbuilding such as a garages or shed, or mounted on the outside or a building?
Some dictionary definitions of ‘premises’ are ‘a house or building, together with its land and outbuildings’ and ‘the land and buildings owned by someone’.
However, Regulation 421.1.201 was principally introduced to cover the interior of a household building and any garage or other outbuildings integral, attached, or in close proximity to that building.
Doubt could exist about whether or not a particular outbuilding could reasonably be considered to be in ‘close proximity’ to the household building. A way of resolving this might be to make a judgement of the likelihood that fire originating inside the enclosure of a consumer unit or similar switchgear in the outbuilding might lead to the outbreak of fire in the household building or in any outbuilding integral or attached to it. Relevant factors to consider about such an outbuilding might include whether or not that building or its expected contents are highly combustible.
Regulation 421.1.201 is not intended to apply to a consumer unit or similar switchgear assembly that is not within a building, such as a consumer unit mounted outdoors on the outside of a building.
I see no reason why a garage CU would need to be an amendment 3 one anyway (well, I see no reason why any of them should be but we all know that). If a garage CU had to be non-combustible then under what criteria? Really under the same reasoning (if you could call it that) then all cookers/hobs/showers/immersion heater switches should be non-combustible.If not then IP rated would be the order of the day as far as I'm concerned.
No it isn't, if there is no risk of a fire spreading to the dwelling, then metal cu is not required.Is a garage unit considered domestic when the garage is remote to the house? If not then IP rated would be the order of the day as far as I'm concerned.
Enter your email address to join: