- Joined
- Nov 28, 2009
- Messages
- 14,844
- Reaction score
- 1,028
Here's todays job I went to look at. Newly re fitted utility room, new laminate flooring (apparently laid over quarry tiles) newly tiled walls, new units fitted, and no socket for the tumble dryer (why don't people plan ahead headbang )
So how to get a socket for the tumble dryer? Ah spur from the washing machine socket 2 metres along the wall and run in conduit behind units.
But the washing machine (double) socket is already a spur.
Can't get another feed from anywhere else, or upgrade the spur to a ring without trashing the finishes already done.
So lets think about this and discuss it.
IF the existing double socket was close enough to reach both appliances, then both plugged into one double socket would be okay. Maximum load would be 26A, just within cable ratings, and a single spur (double) socket is allowed under regs.
But I don't think the socket could be moved to a suitable location, without one or other appliance having a longer than normal mains lead fitted.
So what about change existing double spur to a single, and spur another single from it. Oh dear, not allowed by regs, BUT the same current would flow, the feed cable would be under no more load than if both sockets on the double are used, so WHY is it not allowed by regs?
The only "solution" I can see is as above but with each 13A single socket fed from a 13A FCU. That guarantees no overload of the feeding cable (and covers the situation of someone changing a single for a double), but STILL you have a spur on spur situation to feed the two FCU's.
Can anyone find a legal solution? or (as I suspect will happen) the customer will just use an extension lead under the units to plug the tumble dryer into the existing double socket, which can't be "safer" than providing a propper socket can it?
So how to get a socket for the tumble dryer? Ah spur from the washing machine socket 2 metres along the wall and run in conduit behind units.
But the washing machine (double) socket is already a spur.
Can't get another feed from anywhere else, or upgrade the spur to a ring without trashing the finishes already done.
So lets think about this and discuss it.
IF the existing double socket was close enough to reach both appliances, then both plugged into one double socket would be okay. Maximum load would be 26A, just within cable ratings, and a single spur (double) socket is allowed under regs.
But I don't think the socket could be moved to a suitable location, without one or other appliance having a longer than normal mains lead fitted.
So what about change existing double spur to a single, and spur another single from it. Oh dear, not allowed by regs, BUT the same current would flow, the feed cable would be under no more load than if both sockets on the double are used, so WHY is it not allowed by regs?
The only "solution" I can see is as above but with each 13A single socket fed from a 13A FCU. That guarantees no overload of the feeding cable (and covers the situation of someone changing a single for a double), but STILL you have a spur on spur situation to feed the two FCU's.
Can anyone find a legal solution? or (as I suspect will happen) the customer will just use an extension lead under the units to plug the tumble dryer into the existing double socket, which can't be "safer" than providing a propper socket can it?