The right cert to be issued, whether minor works or EIC

[Murdoch]

I vote minor works - and agree that any alleged reg that actually outright bans multiple cables in an MCB yet allows a large clump of wagos with the same cables. stuffed in the cavity behind is unrealistic and pushing in the wrong direction especially on existing installations.

Ideally as many ways as possible in a board to separate everything as much as possible but often cost/ space/ reality gets involved here

if its not an MWC and its an EIC, then part P applies in England and Wales ............

 

[Murdoch]

When you troll another member there will only ever be one winner and you won't see them by looking in a mirror.

you almost got another down scoob for that

BTW still waiting for your clarification

 

[Fleeting]

you almost got another down scoob for that

BTW still waiting for your clarification

What is to dislike he is a troll.
What clarification are you waiting on I gave a Regulation supporting my comments something you have failed to come forward with.

 

[Murdoch]

What clarification are you waiting on I gave a Regulation supporting my comments something you have failed to come forward with.

Well ......... you are still not confirming what a "circuit" is so your suggestion that 314.4 doesn't hold water IMHO

What is a circuit? A definition please in your own words

 

[Fleeting]

I never ever quoted 'circuit' I quoted 'final circuit' which is what the OP has installed and which the Regulation refers to.

 

[steptoe]

I never ever quoted 'circuit' I quoted 'final circuit' which is what the OP has installed and which the Regulation refers to.

The OP has made an addition to an existing circuit,
What part of that are you having trouble understanding,?

 

[Murdoch]

I'll get my coat , this is going nowhere and I think somebody is just baiting people now

 

[Andy™]

What is to dislike he is a troll.
What clarification are you waiting on I gave a Regulation supporting my comments something you have failed to come forward with.

the reg you came up with doesnt even support your argument

 

[Andy™]

if its not an MWC and its an EIC, then part P applies in England and Wales ............

notifiable or not isnt decided by MWC or EIC

 

[Fleeting]

I'll get my coat , this is going nowhere and I think somebody is just baiting people now

I am not baiting anyone that is my opinion and I stand by it.

 

[binky]

And a nice 3 figure tip for being so NICE

Just saying

Were you feeling alright..

 

[binky]

I am not baiting anyone that is my opinion and I stand by it.

You haven't actually said what your opinion is, although I'm guessing you might be in a majority of one .

 

[NozSpark]

These are the definitions as described by BS7671.... from reading them a circuit can consist of several cables leaving a single protective device, there is absolutely no ambiguity here

 

[Fleeting]

These are the definitions as described by BS7671.... from reading them a circuit can consist of several cables leaving a single protective device, there is absolutely no ambiguity here

View attachment 13377View attachment 13378

And what does 314.4 say about final circuits.

 

[Richard-the-Ninth]

Gentlemen, this is supposed to be the friendliest Electricians forum, but in this thread all you have been doing is arguing with each other. This can not go on, so I see no other choice than to lock the thread.

This forum is meant to be a place of knowledge, the idea being you share that knowledge. Everyone is entitled to their opinion, it does not mean you have to like it, but you must respect it. If you feel someone does not seem to grasp what you are trying to say (This also applies to the whole forum) try wording it differently. It doesn't register at first, but then wham.