No mate it is the experience of being on the toolsMegafar enuff
but having 2391 doesnt make you competent straight away....
No mate it is the experience of being on the toolsMegafar enuff
but having 2391 doesnt make you competent straight away....
firstly he doesnt need itI now know for a fact you don't have the 2391..
---------- Post Auto-Merged at 19:49 ---------- Previous post was made at 19:48 ----------
But if you where the last person who signed a document for that installation it would be you in the dock unfortunately. 2391-10 or not a proved Inspector
I'm not struggling with the regs as you suggest as I too have the 17th ed and 2391-10. I'm never shy to ask a question as that is the way you do learn. I have been around a good few years now and even I know that you will never stop learning.You seem to be struggling with the regs when hardly any have changed in regards to domestic commercial and industrial with the new ammendment!
You seem to be struggling with the regs when hardly any have changed in regards to domestic commercial and industrial with the new ammendment!
mr servI now know for a fact you don't have the 2391.How about giving me your NAPIT membership number and il find out what quals you have. You can have my number and ask for mine. That way we both know we aint 5dw's or control panel builders.
---------- Post Auto-Merged at 19:49 ---------- Previous post was made at 19:48 ----------
But if you where the last person who signed a document for that installation it would be you in the dock unfortunately. 2391-10 or not a proved Inspector
Well done mate. I think that will be my next exam on the to-do list, once I do my 2330 L3 practical. Is it similar?Just found out today that I passed my 2391-10 exam. It seemed like an eternity in getting the result for the written part. It was good doing the practical part as you knew on the day, but that's all over with now til something else comes along. GuinnessGuinnessGuinness
You corrected an already corrected error; and stuffed up the syntax in the process - wallaby :slap :Chair fall:worshipI corrected your spelling KME :slap Perhaps thats his problem, the soapbox ! He needs to stand on one cos he's short ?!
Who knows, Has anyone filled the fridge yet cos my wine bottles empty ?
Hopefully I won't find it too bad then as I have a bit 3 phase experience (though not testing)No mate its a different ball game, a lot of three phase stuff iirc.AndyGuinness
then you are NOT competent,I've told you lot what I have. Level2 2330, level3 2330, 17th Edition & 2391-10. 6 & half years in the trade,
What a delusional post, looking for a rise. Not once have I said I'm the only one pass the 2391. What I have said is that in my personal opinion if you don't have the 2391 qualification then you aren't a proven competent inspector and tester and I wouldn't employ you to do such a job without that certificate! Nor do I think I am the most qualified. Lol I'm 23 years of age ffs. I have taken the correct route though and I'm looking to gain as many qualifications as I can to enhance my competence. That being nvq3 and the 2391-20 design course. Wether people have been wiring houses since I was in nappies is irrelivent. No testing qual, no proven competency in that area. The only reason I can see people disagreeing with this is because they don't have it. I am immensly proud to have it under my belt because its a very hard and notorious qual, so those who mock it are very misguided. It has a 60% failure rate across the country. Canoeboy was offended because I asked him what quals he has, instead of telling me he decided to give me the cold shoulder.Boys:I suppose we`d better wind our heads in - Im beginning to think that only one member of the whole wide forum has successfully passed the 2391 (shame he couldn`t pass spelling at school; but we won`t go there.......) - all the rest of us must have failed. :slap Wet Fish
OY! Electricserv, or whatever you call yourself. If you were to have access to every members` technical qualifications; I think you`d find yourself quite a way down the list - not on the top of it, as you seem to think! Similarly with experience - many of us will have been wiring properties while you were still in nappies - so I`d get off your soapbox a bit, and try listening to other points of view.
That is all I am saying, else I`ll be getting in trouble.
you probably couldnt afford any of us anyway.What a delusional post, looking for a rise. Not once have I said I'm the only one pass the 2391. What I have said is that in my personal opinion if you don't have the 2391 qualification then you aren't a proven competent inspector and tester and I wouldn't employ you to do such a job without that certificate! Nor do I think I am the most qualified. Lol I'm 23 years of age ffs. I have taken the correct route though and I'm looking to gain as many qualifications as I can to enhance my competence. That being nvq3 and the 2391-20 design course. Wether people have been wiring houses since I was in nappies is irrelivent. No testing qual, no proven competency in that area. The only reason I can see people disagreeing with this is because they don't have it. I am immensly proud to have it under my belt because its a very hard and notorious qual, so those who mock it are very misguided. It has a 60% failure rate across the country. Canoeboy was offended because I asked him what quals he has, instead of telling me he decided to give me the cold shoulder.
I haven't once said I believe myself to be competent across the board. I know I still have things to learn. I never did a proper apprentiship. I have however been involved in the industry for 6 and a half years. I've been a trainee, mate, electrician, team leader. My voice on this thread was having the 2391 goes a long way of proving your competence in inspection & testing than not having it!then you are NOT competent,not by your own definition anyways,
almost any place/country I have worked deems competency to have occurred via quals, hands on knowledge of the specific area of work, and 10, yes, 10 years post apprenticeship experience.
your 6&1/2 leaves you about 8&1/2 years short, if we can believe you served a proper apprenticeship of 5 years!
Enter your email address to join: