Now:
Which of the "over-voltage issues" are we referring to?
The theoretical one, caused by the European "harmonisation" ( :slap ) - i.e call it something it isn`t.
or
The physical one, which has existed for a long time, caused by the DNO`s lengths of LV, whch means that they have to lift the voltage ( within limits that have shrunk since the harmonisation) on the sub taps, in order to comply with the minimum voltage levels on the ends of the runs.
or
The semi-existential one; which can may artificially increase the LV on the end of a leg, under certain conditions; exacerbated by the propensity of SSEGs to all create at the same time, and all stop at the same time ( within a given geographic).
I still have equipment in my house ( admittedly primarily test equip. and audio), which are provided with taps for200, 220, 240, and 250 V
The equip in question is, in the main, valve stuff - Which means this was considered an issue then - long before PV - their solution was to allow the item to be tapped to the right voltage.
You said, a while back, about this being a "safety issue"?
Do you honestly expect me to believe that this is suddenly becoming dangerous, and needs to be addressed by having a "box of tricks" in the circuit?
Using the same rhetoric, can we put 5WW in a box, as they`re even more dangerous ( and there IS proof to back that up!)? :needdrink: